Personal
Behind the scenes… The process
We have received a lot of questions, both in person and via email, about how we select the pictures that make our blog. We wanted to give a quick example of the dynamic our conversation’s have and how we choose (or debate) what makes it.
Here our two images from our recent engagement shoot. The first shot made it into the blog and the second did not (you can see who won this debate).


The debate begins…
Eric: How about this one? I love it. (Pops up Image #2 on his screen)
Neal: What? Nah… They wanted a feeling of isolation. They didn’t want to be blurred like they are from ‘The Ring’.
Eric: But it expresses that feeling. Do you really need to see the couple clearly to have a good image?
Neal: You can’t see ANY pattern to their faces; it’s just like a big blob. (Pointing towards the screen)
Both of us look very curiously at the image for a minute.
Neal: If there is no distinguishable human features… they might as well be aliens.
Eric: So you don’t like it?
Neal: It’s not that I don’t like it; it’s that I don’t like it for the blog. Clients want to see themselves. Their families and friends expect to be shown something that resembles the people they love, not two alien figures.
Eric: But there is some worth in a purely emotional image, you know it is them by their form. It transcends from a portrait into a piece of art. I think I would enjoy an image of myself that was not like starring into a mirror.
The debate continues…
We are a collaborative project, and in being so there are usually different directions each of us would like to grow. Shooting as a team, we can take those risks and have the freedom to experiment with the bounds of traditional wedding photography. But we are anxious to hear what you think, both clients and photographers about the limits and process of image making.
Eric and Neal
| Facebook Twitter |


















Interesting conversation. My wife and I go through the same thing as I’m working on our blogs. Are you guys sure you’re not married?
February 19, 2008 | 4:22 pm Josh Solaryeah…I am gonna have to go with Neal on this one.
But never fear, Eric, I don’t judge regarding the whole “Mac” vs “PC” thing
February 20, 2008 | 3:09 pm vickieAlso, why don’t you just send them both images? (you prob already did that)
February 20, 2008 | 3:10 pm vickieI love the idea so I have to go with Eric, sorry Neal!!! I would love to have that hanging (with the two of us in the pic, obviously) in our living room. I like his idea of not staring at yourself and the transformation into a piece of art.
February 21, 2008 | 8:59 am Kari McKinzieI will stay neutral – but I agree that it is important to push the artform and explore all possibilities for capturing one scene. Both are valid and beautiful here. Neal’s image is all about the overall scene and the couple as the center of that. Eric’s image is all about texture and form. Love that you two can capture such different interpretations of the same scene. Keep up the good work!
February 21, 2008 | 2:54 pm Nicole Ellishaha. thanks for the blog love. I was waiting for this post – the “lovers..uh, except not lovers quarrel” post.
February 24, 2008 | 6:34 pm ashley+jeremyI heart tilt shift.
Oh my gosh, you guys are hilarious. After working with you on the shoot, I can definitely picture this debate happening. I was just excited to see another picture of MYSELF…even though I couldn’t make out my own face…but let’s be honest, it’s all about ME. Hah. Can’t wait for April! You guys are amazing, I love both shots!
February 26, 2008 | 11:48 am Cara